Transcript of “Rights Here, Rights Now - Episode : “All About the Civil Commitment
Process in Virginia” produced by the disAbility Law Center of
Virginia.
[NARRATOR]: The
information provided on this podcast does not, and is not
intended to, constitute legal advice. Instead, all information, content
and materials available are for general informational purposes only.
[Intro Music: Light rhythmic percussion beats, finger snaps &
hand claps]
[VIRGINIA]: Welcome to Rights Here, Rights Now: The podcast about
disability, advocacy, and activism. I’m your Advocate Host, Virginia Pharis -
[SUZANNE]: and I’m your Advocate Guest Host Suzanne H
[VIRGINIA]: Every two weeks, we dig into relevant issues, current events, and
avenues for self-advocacy -
[SUZANNE]: ‘cause someone
has to -
[VIRGINIA]: It might as well be us!
[SUZANNE]: This podcast is produced by the disAbility Law Center of Virginia, the
Commonwealth’s protection and advocacy agency for disability rights. Find out
more at www.dlcv.org
[VIRGINIA]: So Suzanne thank you so much for joining me in the studio today.
[SUZANNE]: Thank you, I’m so excited to be here!
[VIRGINIA]: Well we have you here guest hosting it up with
us because in a shocking turn of events our guest expert for this episode is
our usual advocate cohost Ms. Ren Faszewski. That’s right. We will be talking
about kind of a serious topic today. We’ll be talking about the TDO and ECO
process. We’ll be getting into what that all means in a minute but I just
wanted to put out a soft content warning. We’re not going to be getting into
anything really upsetting today but if you have some sensitivities on hearing
about the involuntarily commitment process this might not be the episode for
you and that’s fine and you can join us again next week. But in the meantime,
let’s check out disAbility in the News:
Last
week the U.S. Senate unanimously approved a bill known as the Lifespan Respite
Care Reauthorization Act of 2019. This bill authorizes 50 million dollars over
the next five years for community-based respite care services across the
country. The federal government has provided grants to 37 states along with
Washington DC through the respite care program to streamline delivery of
services, coordinate resources, and offer trainings to respite providers and
family caregivers. There are an estimated 45 million family caregivers across
the United States and they provide billions of uncompensated care every year.
Respite care is essential to caregivers as it helps to reduce mental and
physical health and stress issues caregivers often face. The House of
Representatives passed a similar bill last summer and the two bills are
currently being reconciled before legislation moves on to the president. Find
out more at www.disabilityscoop.com This has been disability
in the news.
[VIRGINIA]: Ren, hello and thank you for joining us in the
studio but in a slightly different chair than usual.
[REN]: It is a slightly different chair and I’m a little uncomfortable
with it because I’m now so used to my place but I do know things too so this
will be exciting for me.
[SUZANNE]: Does it feel weird to have someone else in your chair? You’re just
starting at me with jealousy.
[REN]: Yeah there’s little bit of judgement there but you’re doing great
Suzanne!
[SUZANNE]: Thank you I need that
encouragement.
[VIRGINIA]: So the TDO and ECO process
is a lot of letters.
[REN]: It
is a lot of letters! We’ll get down to the letters. This is how its most commonly known. The entire process is the civil
commitment process. But when you talk to people that are sort of connected to
it TDO and ECO are the ones that come up in terms of how they describe it. So lets first talk about the TDO
that’s the Temporary Detention Order. This is a legal order in which someone is
committed for immediate hospitalization for a 72-hour period on an involuntary
basis.
[VIRGINIA]: Yeah that’s kind of the key to this entire
process that we’ll be talking about today. That it’s the involuntary commitment
process.
[REN]: The
Eco is the Emergency Custody order. This is an order by a Magistrate in which
police are able to put somebody into custody in order to get them evaluated for
the involuntary commitment process. So those are the letters (group laugh) that
most people know about as far as the process.
[SUZANNE]: So other than what it means in a very broad
sense what’s the nitty gritty? Let’s start chronologically, what starts this
process?
[REN]: To
begin this process in any kind of way there needs to be some kind of
psychiatric crisis going on. An individual need to be either dealing with really
intense mental health symptoms that are placing them at harms risk for hurting
themselves or others or making it very difficult for them to take care of
themselves. The psychiatric crisis is the key here. If someone is having mental
health symptoms but they’re still able to go to work, or they’re still able to
feed themselves, or they’re struggling but aren’t in imminent danger they
shouldn’t be connected in this process what so ever. In terms of typical lay
people, let’s say you have a friend who is really struggling and they start
saying they’re going to hurt themselves and you want to help them.
This is a very typical way for the initiation of this process is
by calling 911. So, you call 911 and say, “I have a friend I’m really worried
about their safety” and the best way to do this is to recommend specifically
for a crisis intervention trained officer or CIT. These are officers that are specifically trained to respond to mental health crises
and to have de-escalation techniques to work with people who are struggling
with mental health, or even with developmental disabilities and things of
that nature.
[VIRGINIA]: Ok important question about that, do every
city and county have CIT trained officers?
[REN]: They
do not. I believe Richmond and some of the bigger counties have really large
population of officers who have been trained. But once
you get further out from that you start to see less and less and less. And
that’s something that the state is sort of working on but it’s not something
that is available everywhere yet. But its
always a good thing to ask in case you don’t know.
[SUZANNE]: Though as someone from south west Virginia I feel the need to point out that I think it
started in Blacksburg, the CIT program.
[REN AND VIRGINIA]: Oh!
[SUZANNE]: Shout out to my south west Virginia folks.
[REN]: So
once you’ve called 911 and an officer is on the scene, that officer can make
the determination if somebody needs to be evaluated
right away.
[VIRGINIA]: Now if someone had a history with law
enforcement where it wouldn’t necessarily be the best idea to call law
enforcement is there anyone else that a loved one could call if they were
concerned?
[SUZANNE]: You can always call... if you’re aware of this
individual’s record, like if they already have a psychiatrist, or they’re already connected to services, it’s always great to see
if you can work with that individual to see if you can get them to agree to
voluntary stuff. So you know you can contact their psychiatrist. You can also
call the community services board crisis line. Every CSB has a crisis line and
you can call them. They might be the ones who get in contact with the police.
They might say you can drive them down straight to us. I just mention the
police officer route as that’s one of the common ways this process gets initiated.
[SUZANNE]: If we’re being honest that’s probably how most
people begin their interaction with this process.
[REN]: As
far as the ECO is concerned, an officer can come on the scene and say hey this
person really needs to be evaluated. And that person
may refuse or may not be able to consent. Let’s say if they’re really really sick and they’re just not able to make those kinds
of decisions in that moment. That officer would issue what is
called a paperless ECO. That means there’s no actual piece of paper
right there with the magistrate’s signature saying you can put this person in
custody. But the police have that authority to say I think this person needs to
be taken in for evaluation. An individual can call for an ECO directly to the
magistrate and get a paper ECO. That’s not nearly as typical because obviously
this would be in a crisis situation but that is an avenue that has
occurred.
[VIRGINIA]: So you’re saying “magistrate”. For those of us
who aren’t as familiar with that term, what is a magistrate?
[REN]: A
magistrate is a local independent judicial officer. They make decisions in
hearings on minor crime stuff as well as for civil commitment cases. So they’re
the ones who write off on Emergency Custody Orders. They’re the ones who write
off on Temporary Detention Orders and eventually that moves people through the
process. So they’re the ones who actually stamp their signature on the piece of
paper saying this if what’s going to happen. So once an ECO is in place this
initiates an 8 hour window. So in this 8 hours a person has to be evaluated by a CSB and at the end of that 8 hours the ECO
expires. They can no longer be in custody because of like civil rights and
stuff -
[SUZANNE AND
VIRGINIA]: Yep always good to have! (group
laugh)
[REN]: You
can’t just keep people in custody for a really long time. I’m Virginia right
now it’s 8 hours. It was previously 6 but in 2014, I
want to say, they extended it.
[VIRGINIA]: When you say “in custody” what does that mean?
Are we talking in custody like for police?
[REN]: What
it means is you’re not arrested for a crime but that the police are able to
keep you within their, again custody, within their...
[VIRGINIA]: Sort of like the police
are responsible for you for that period of time.
[REN]: Right,
so they’re responsible for you. It can mean that you are
handcuffed. That’s something that mental health professionals are having
a conversation with law enforcement about because obviously that’s very
traumatizing. Typically in my experience, prior to be an advocate, I have seen
handcuffs in transportation. So when an officer has an ECO and you’re putting
an individual in a police car then sometimes you see handcuffs in place until
you get to either the emergency room or the CSB crisis center.
There is a space in the ECO as well as in the TDO order that a
magistrate can authorize the use of alternative transportation but right now
it’s kind of used far and few between. There’s not really a readily accessible
service for that. It’s usually like a family member or somebody like that who
would be involved in that.
[SUZANNE]: You don’t have explicit right to not be
handcuffed in this process but you know if you’re somebody who is experiencing
this and you’re interfacing with the police, if you have a trauma history, if
it’s going to be detrimental to you to put you in handcuffs, let them know
that. They’re not trying to make things worse.
[REN]: Right
and again this is part of that ongoing conversation about CIT trained officers
because they’re much more aware of these nuances. There’s also specifically for
people with developmental disabilities, the REACH program. It’s trying to be utilized during these points of time because using REACH
can also help mitigate or help explain what’s going on with the individual like
why they might be acting a certain way. It won’t change the fact that the
person is going to be evaluated but can provide some
additional support.
[SUZANNE]: And just for our listeners who might not have
that background just to be totally clear REACH is the statewide crisis response
system for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
[REN]: For
an Emergency Custody Order a magistrate can’t just say boom, I’ll slap you with
one just cause I feel like it. You do have to meet
certain criteria. The person has to have a mental illness or there has to be a
substantial likelihood that as a result of that mental illness that they would
cause serious physical harm to themselves or others or suffer serious harm due
to the lack of capacity to protect themselves from harm. The person also is in
need of hospitalization or treatment and the person is unwilling to volunteer
or is incapable of volunteering for treatment.
All of those things have
to be there in order for the ECO to be granted. So
again just because you have a mental illness doesn’t mean you’re going to meet
this criteria. You might be really sick but you then might want to voluntarily
go to a hospital or to an outpatient treatment center then all of this isn’t
necessary. All of these things have to be in place for this order to be granted.
[VIRGINIA]: It’s also worth saying that if somebody is
displaying dangerous behavior or self-harming behaviors and they don’t
necessarily have a diagnosis on the books of a mental illness that doesn’t mean
that they can not be subject to an ECO.
[REN]: Right,
if there is evidence to believe that this is something that is going on with a
mental health condition or some sort of developmental disability, something of
that nature, again that understanding is what informs sort of that decision. So
let’s talk about the TDO.
[VIRGINIA AND SUZANNE]: The TDO, is it time? You’ve told us
all about the ECO let’s get the TDO party started.
[REN]: Well
right before the TDO, once the ECO is granted you’re
taken to be evaluated. This is what determines if the TDO happens. So you are evaluated by a representative from the community services
board. This evaluation is typically called a pre screening and the person called a pre screener. That’s
the language you’ll really here. What they do is they evaluate whether you are
in need of treatment and whether that treatment needs to be involuntary. There
are kind of the same conditions that an ECO needs are the same conditions that
a TDO needs to meet. Again that person needs to have some sort of mental health
condition or the likelihood of a mental health condition.
Because of this condition there is a risk of them hurting
themselves or others or that they’re going to suffer harm due to inability to
care for themselves. What we see a lot of in the community is let’s say really
suffering from depression and is not eating not drinking really unable to get
out of bed, things like that. Are they at immediate risk of harming themselves
probably not but you’re seeing that risk of injury because they’re not able to
care for themselves. That’s the scenario that we’re talking about. And again
they need to need (light laugh) hospitalization or treatment and they’re
unwilling to volunteer or are incapable of volunteering. Again sometimes people
are really sick, or let’s say due to a developmental disability struggle with
understanding these kinds of decisions, particularly if someone has a guardian
or something like that.
If they’re not able to make the decision voluntarily a TDO would be considered. A pre screener determines all sorts of
stuff during this evaluation. Obviously they talk to the person and figure out
what’s happening. They talk to the police, they see if they can get a hold of
family members or whoever was there. Maybe there’s previous records at the CSB.
Maybe they already have access to that persons
psychiatrist because they go to the CSB. They look at all this information and
at the end of it they either say nope I think this person needs to be
involuntarily committed.
At that point they would, the civil commitment process would end
in terms of involuntarily committing somebody but a prescreener would
still work with that person to try and connect them with resources. To try and
get them into an outpatient program or maybe there are crisis programs, the one
I’m thinking of right now is through RBHA. They have a crisis unit. It’s on a
completely voluntary basis but it provides more intensive care.
[SUZANNE]: If you or a loved one are in crisis and can
work it out to go through a voluntary system, whether that’s inpatient
hospitalization or outpatient services, so much of the time the outcomes are
just better for that person in terms of their recovery if they feel like they
have agency over this process. If they feel like it’s their choice to go into
treatment. So I just wanted to put that out into the universe.
[REN]: It’s
very true. People who have, who seek treatment voluntarily are much more
invested in the treatment than people who are involuntarily committed and
obviously the people who are making that decision feel like they have to make
that decision to keep people safe but certainly all the voluntary services and
all of the preventative services are always a much better option.
[VIRGINIA]: And are we going to have some resources for
people who might have a loved one in that kind of situation. Would they be up
on our website?
[REN]: Well
we definitely have mental health resources already up on our website and we’ll
make sure to have some extra quick guides or extra phone numbers that they
people can get connected to those things.
[SUZANNE]: Yeah Virginia really is a pretty big state.
It’s culturally different, it’s logistically different, it’s geographically
distant and so your best bet probably if you or a loved one are in crisis again
is to call your local community services board cause they are going to be the
most likely to know what local programs are available. And to be able to answer
location specific stuff.
And if you’re someone who doesn’t know, community services board,
I don’t know what that is, I don’t know where mine is, how would they find that
kind of information?
[REN]: If
you have internet access you can always just google community services board
and your city or county. So after the pre screener can say, no we’re not
going to involuntarily commit this person, but obviously they can also say
we’re going to pursue involuntary commitment, aka the TDO. So in this case they
finished the evaluation and they send that off to the magistrate, and the
magistrate then is the person who actually makes the order because obviously
they are the judicial officer and they need that fancy law stamp. Once that
order’s in place its the prescreener’s responsibility
to find a bed.
And they have a whole list of all the available beds in all of the
private and state facilities and they call. It’s a very boring process but they
call everybody and say “hey I have Joe and Joe needs a bed and you go through
the whole list and you figure out where a bed is a available. And once you find that bed you inform
the magistrate and then they go.
So you’re talking about calling for available beds, what if there
aren’t any available beds.
[REN]: So
that’s a really good questions. We’re going to talk about the bed of last
resort legislation and the reason this came about was in 2014 Senator Creigh Deeds son was going through the involuntary
commitment process when we was released due to lack of available beds.
Unfortunately this ended with his suicide.
So the Virginia legislature enacted what is
called the bed of last resort. You’ll also hear it as the Deeds
legislation and this law requires that state mental hospitals accept patients
who are under Temporary Detention Orders if no bed can be
found in a private facility within that 8 hours after an ECO is
initiated. So what we’ll see very typically is that even with individuals who are brought to the emergency room without an ECO that when a
TDO is put into place an ECO is put into place as well.
So once that ECO reaches that 8 hour limit that person is automatically sent to a state psychiatric facility. This
would be Central State or Eastern State, Northern Virginia Mental health
institute, things of that nature. That was specifically put
into place for that not to happen. So that no matter what happens you will be sent to a facility and receive care.
So that brings us to the end of the TDO itself. What happens when
a TDO expires? Because you know it’s 3 business days, effectively 3 business
days, 72 hours. So when that runs out does the person just get to leave?
[REN]: No
not quite! Sometimes maybe. So once again when the pre
screening ends and the TDO is initiated. They
find you a bed. Then the police take you to the facility in which the bed is found and that 72 hours is that they consider
stabilization. So you’re there to get immediate treatment. Before the end of
that 72 hour window or if it’s on a holiday or weekend it might be that next
business day you’ll have what’s called a commitment hearing and this is a court
process involving a special justice. They hear evidence from the pre screener.
They hear evidence from the hospital that you’re in. They receive
evidence from all sorts of places and they consider that evidence to determine
whether that person needs to continue receiving treatment involuntarily
specifically. There can be several outcomes of this but that is the specific
outcome which they’re determining, whether that is necessary. At this hearing
you have the right to appear at the hearing and present your own case and hear
all the evidence that is presented. You will also
receive a court appointed attorney.
They’re there to represent your best interests and your wishes
specifically. Even if people, the court, the prescreener
or what have you believe that it’s in your best interest to remain in the
hospital, this court appointed attorney is there to represent your interests.
So if you say I don’t want to be hospitalized, it’s
their responsibility to say this person should not be hospitalized because of
xyz.
[VIRGINIA]: Now with court appointed attorneys, I know
that is how it’s supposed to work, but the reality is we get enough calls to know
that your mileage may vary, when it comes to court appointed attorneys. Do you
have to use the attorney that’s been appointed to you
or can you get your own lawyer?
[REN]: You
can get your own lawyer. That is your right, to get your own private attorney.
But it’s important to know that regardless of your ability to pay for a private
attorney you will be getting one for this process. Another part of the TDO/ECO
civil commitment process is that the CSB providing the prescreening is
responsible for contacting, or making a reasonable attempt to contact a family
member, your health care agent, your guardian, someone
who helps you manage these types of things, to contact them to let them know
this process is happening.
That goes the same for the commitment hearing,
that they are responsible for informing these people when the commitment
hearing is, that they can participate in the commitment hearing. Because again
a health care agent, someone who makes decisions on your behalf, if you have an
advance directive, they need to be notified of this
process so that they can make those decisions on your behalf!
[SUZANNE]: Yeah I know some people will wonder is the
hospital contacting these folks who may be family members who you want nothing
to do with, is that a HIPPA violation?
[REN]: So
it’s the CSB that’s contacting these folks. And the CSB as part of the
prescreening process should be gathering this information from you. So this
should information you have provided through this process. They can’t just go
into their random hat of names and just pick one out.
[VIRGINIA]: They’re not calling your 4th grade math
teacher. “Mrs Stone work on my behalf “(light laugh)
It’s really more of an emergency contact that you’ve provided. That’s less
creepy!
[REN]: Again
some of these folks have already had contact with the CSB or receive services
with the CSB so if they’re involved in this process, the CSB should be like “ok
they live with their mother and their mother always brings them to their appts let me call their mom” or this is their guardian’s
name I should contact their guardian, or we already have a copy of their
advance directive, let me figure out who’s on that.
[VIRGINIA]: Speaking of advance directives, I would not be
myself if I didn’t use this as an opportunity to mention that if you have an
advance directive and you’re going through this involuntary commitment process,
civil commitment process, that can inform things like who you want to have
called without them having to ask, it can have that information on there. It
can have here is who’s making decisions if I can’t make it for myself. It can
even have if...
We’ll go through this in an advance directives episode later but
there’s even language you can put in there if I’m really really
sick and saying that I don’t consent to being hospitalized, that I as a well
person writing this advance directive that I’m telling you it’s ok to
voluntarily hospitalize me. So there’s you know, an advance directive may make
this process look a little bit different as might powers of attorney documents,
that kind of thing.
[REN]: Well
it’s kind of like how we touched on in the beginning. While this process is
important to have, it should be a last resort process. The idea is that we can
try to get advance directives and voluntary admissions and voluntary treatment
and all of that stuff first to prevent this process from happening.
[SUZANNE]: So we talked about what happens at the
commitment hearing, what are the possible outcomes?
[REN]: Obviously
the petition could be dismissed and you’re released!
You just do what you need to do out in the community. You could also have
mandatory outpatient treatment ordered. This would be for up to 90 days. You can be allowed to voluntarily remain in the hospital if
you’re capable of making that decision. And of course you could be
involuntarily committed. So those tend to be the different outcomes that we
see. And part of that process of working with your attorney or working with the
individuals that you want there to be present at the hearing, is figuring out
what’s the best option for you and making that case.
[SUZANNE]: So are there other issues with the civil
commitment process that we need to be aware of that we haven’t already gone
over?
[REN]: Well
of course part of of what we’ve talked about as part
of DLCV as an agency, is that we’ve talked about the “extraordinary barriers
list”. These are folks that are at state psychiatric facilities who have been
determined ready for discharge for at least 2 weeks and have
not yet been discharged. Anytime somebody has been involuntarily
committed and the court is then making decisions on how long they’re there you
know... We want you to be discharged as quickly as
possible, sometimes that doesn’t happen.
And that’s something again we as an agency are working towards but
that’s one of the risks and one of the reasons we want to see if we can put all
of these services in place before the involuntary commitment process
occurs. Because you might be there and you might be there for a lot longer than
you were hoping. And that can be really disruptive obviously to your life, to
your job, to your living situation, everything like that.
[VIRGINIA]: And while DLCV doesn’t necessarily help people who have complaints
about the involuntary commitment process or who are sort of in the process of
going through that; we don’t have the capability to help because that’s an
active court process. We are able to help people who are a little bit stuck in
the system and may need help getting discharged. That’s a good reason to call
DLCV.
[REN]: And
something to know about this process. The ECO doesn’t have an appeal because it
a different kind of police custody thing. The TDO and the civil commitment
itself those are things you can appeal. When you are awarded your court
appointed attorney or hired an attorney that person can appeal the TDO itself
or also appeal your civil commitment if you are involuntarily committed. So
those are things that are appealable. One of the other issues again with this
process, we need to speak about it very plainly, you are losing your right to
make these decisions. When you are involuntarily committed you can not make the decision whether to pursue your own
treatment because the court has made the decision that you are going to be in
this treatment.
[VIRGINIA]: Now that doesn’t mean you don’t get to make
decisions about the treatment you’re receiving and that doesn’t mean you don’t
get to participate in your own treatment but it’s not your choice whether
you’re in the hospital or not.
[REN]: And
part of that means, in the state of Virginia, if you’ve been TDOed and involuntarily committed, that you lose the right
to possess firearms. So that is something to be aware of again with this loss
of rights, that’s something you will lose the right to do. I think it’s a
misdemeanor, I’m not a lawyer don’t quote me but I’m pretty sure it’s
considered a misdemeanor in this state.
[VIRGINIA]: So thank you so much! That was a little bit of
a weird note to end on (laughs)
[REN]: Again
I think this process is really confusing and there’s a lot of twists and turns
in it that’s why it’s really hard to give sort of a straight forward A to B to
C process because that’s just not how it works. Because you know,you could jump start the process here, you could
jumpstart it here, you can get an ECO here, so you know it’s.. I would love it
to be straightforward, I’m pretty sure the whole state would love it to be
straightforward (group laugh) That would be great! But
it just isn’t. So hopefully this is at least giving a bare bones description on
sort of the big pieces of it.
[SUZANNE]: Right, and as an agency we have been working
on putting together sort of a map of the civil commitment process to go up on
our website so people can see sort of what it looks like. They can click
through, they can see what laws apply to each section. But you know honestly when I was putting that together I thought it was gonna look sort of like a decision tree, like everything
branches out into two very neat segments. No, it looks like an @ sign some how -
[REN & VIRGINIA]: Its very loop de loop. Its just all over the place!
[REN]: Yeah
again hopefully this information is very clear so our listeners can use it.
Suzanne you did a great job as me today! Like the best me I could me!
(Laughs)
[SUZANNE]: Oh my gosh, that’s
all I ever wanted to hear (group laugh) is that my impersonation of someone
else, especially a co worker, is as accurate as
possible! Thank you so much for breaking all of that really complex information
down so that’s it’s more understandable, even though as we talked about the
process itself can be very complicated.
[REN]: You’re so
welcome, I hope this helps!
______________________________
[PRE-RECORDED VOICEOVER/NARRATOR]
And now, for a dLCV
highlight:
Kate is a 21 year old student who has
BIG DREAMS. When she and her mother first spoke to dLCV, her career goal was to
work at Chuck E Cheese. She loves children and
animals, and she wants to work at a job where she can work with both.
Kate was not receiving appropriate pre
job skills training (pre employment
transition services, Pre ETS) at school, and unfortunately, her only “training”
was following the janitor throughout the school. When mom called dLCV, she was
frustrated that the VR agencies did not see Kate as a priority. dLCV was able
to step in, advocate for appropriate vocational rehabilitation and pre employment transition services, and encourage Kate to
speak up for herself. By the time we closed Kate’s case, she had gone to three
different trial work experiences in jobs that she was interested in.
[VIRGINIA]: So thank you again to Ren for talking to us
about that very complicated TDO/ECO process. As with so many of our topics this
is one of those that’s a little hard to wrap your head around but it’s really
important for folks to know about. There’s no hand book for this!
[SUZANNE]: There’s not but I think Ren did a good job of
giving us one of most basic of handbooks that we can start navigating the
process.
[VIRGINIA]: And thank you again to you Suzanne for
stepping in courageously to Ren’s advocate co-host shoes and asking the most
pertinent of questions.
[SUZANNE]: Thank you it’s a good way to spend an afternoon, hanging out in a
podcast studio with you guys. Happy to be here.
[VIRGINIA]: Thank you all for listening to this episode of
Rights Here Rights Now, brought to you by the disAbility
Law Center of Virginia. We’re available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or
wherever you get your podcasts. And don’t forget to subscribe and leave a
review!
[SUZANNE]: If you need assistance, or want more
information about dLCV and what we do, visit us online at dLCV.org.
[VIRGINIA]: And follow us on Twitter @disAbilityLawVA and share us with your friends.
[SUZANNE]: Until next time, who knows when that will be for me but I’ll think
of you all fondly in the meantime. I’m your guest advocate co-host Suzanne
H
[VIRGINIA]: and I’m your co-host
Virginia Pharis, and this has been –
[VIRGINIA &
SUZANNE]: Rights Here Rights Now End